When it comes to migrant workers, Israel’s High Court is all High-Level Babble

The fact that Israel chooses to base its nursing sector on migrant workers and turn the patients into employers does not mean that migrant workers must pay the price. That is, unless one listens to the rulings of the High Court of Justice.

Filipino children at protest against arrest of child of migrant worker (Activestills)
Filipino children at protest against arrest of child of migrant worker (Activestills)

Those who do not appear before the High Court of Justice may mistakenly believe that legal proceedings are conducted there. The sides make claims, at length, and prove their statements. The judges press them, requesting additional evidence. While we inherited the High Court of Justice from the British, this is no House of Lords. Legal proceedings are conducted in the House of Lords. High-Level Babble is conducted at the High Court of Justice.

High-Level Babble deals with issues that are on the agenda, and repeats banal slogans. You can say whatever you want in High-Level Babble, share your duty free experiences, and draw conclusions based on what you heard on the radio, read in the paper distributed for free on the bus, or heard in a other High-Level Babble. There’s no need to delve deep, and proof is not required. Lively High-Level Babble will conclude with a decision on whoever is the loudest, or an understanding that there are different views, and in the harshest cases it will conclude with the recognition that this is an issue that the Knesset must handle. Oh, yeah – participants in High-Level Babble are predominantly male.

The problem is that sometimes High-Level Babble in the High Court of Justice results in verdicts. In a verdict handed down more than three years ago, the judges – two males and a female – assumed what was best for migrant workers (sorry, the verdict determines that she is not a “migrant worker,” as there are no migrant workers in Israel, there are only “foreign workers”), and what is best for them is to work as caregivers without getting paid overtime. Why? Because it is common knowledge that they are poor in their home countries, and they come here, and all of our goodness is bestowed on them, so even if we take a little from them, their lives here are still golden compared to what could have been had they stayed in the decrepit places from which they came. Plus we can’t forget the flip side, which is no walk in the park – those taken care of by the nurses, their employers, who we feel bad for, because they are in a sorry state. And yeah, let the Knesset deal with it.

The Knesset, of course, didn’t handle it, and a decision was handed down this week to a request for an additional deliberation on the verdict. Six men participated in the deliberation, and three women joined them. And lo and behold: Four judges wrote a new babble that justifies the former, and added that they feel bad about the poor female caregivers and the poor male patients, and “oh me oh my,” and the Knesset should handle this. The fifth judge wrote that the state is to blame for what is happening, but it is what it is, and so he joined the others, and the Knesset really should deal with this. As such, with a majority decision, the appeal was rejected. The sixth judge said that his friends were right, but, come on, this isn’t cool, give the workers twenty percent more and be done with it. And the three female judges? They wrote a verdict. A real one. In it they explained that employees are employees are employees, and because they are employees they are subject to labor law, even when they work for poor people. If Israel chose to base the nursing sector on migrant workers and turn the patients into employers, that does not mean that migrant workers must pay the price, and they must be paid for their work.